And with this demand grew their ambition. With the instatiable demand of cocain from America, their fortune grew at a rate that seemed nothing short of a miracle. While surfing through the critics commenting on the web series of Narcos, one may find comparisons of Narcos being made with Breaking Bad, Goodfellas and other such series, however the question to deal here with is that could a columbian view the story of Pablo Escobar as entertainment? Pablo Escobar and other drug lords rose to prominence in Medellin and Cali. He is considered one of the great heros of the Hispanic independence movements of the early 19th century In recent years, “narco novelas” have become a staple of Spanish-language television, and I have avoided them like the plague. Simon Bolivar is viewd as a national icon in much of modern South America. Narcos as a web show attracts audience from both countries and can be studies within an audience-centered framewokr for both audiences. Previous studies argued that current events and news programming were more likely to satisfy these needs (Rubin, 1983). These needs include the ability to use media as conversation fodder, allowing them to further interact with viewers their own age who are also attracted to reality programming. (2012) found that college-aged viewers are attracted to reality programming to satisfy instrumental needs. (2012) were able to find that social interaction, having something to talk about with other people, is also a primary motivation for people and drives them to watch shows that can become topics of conversation. It was also important for the audience to satisfy their sense of curiosity crime dramas exposed a world they weren’t familiar with and they wanted to find out more (Brown et al. More often than not, these narconovelas end up skimping on history, and celebrating the extravagant lifestyle that drug trafficking allowed (Pobutsky, 2013) Netflix’s Narcos seems to fall under this new subgenre, where the lives of famous drug lords such as Escobar are depicted under the impression of an accurate historical framework, but in the end, glorify the “achievements” that drugs enabled them. ” Despite the amount of harm he caused the country, Escobar continues to be a subject of morbid curiosity for the Colombian audience and for audiences around the globe (Pobutsky, 2013) While some dramatic liberties have been taken in this show, particularly with the timeline, all of the major events actually happened, and you can Google them after each episode to read up on them. People say that all the time, but in this case, you simply cannot. Mackenzie Dawson (2015) in his review in the New York Post commented about the reality-based drama: “You cannot make this up. Pablo Escobar was such a figure, with the power and violence and success, that he is a suitabel structure in the current times of how ambition can be over turned and the Americans have their perspective of trying to contain the drugs that finally made their way into Miami and other parts of US. As in the earlier time we had the historical narrative which was more controlled by the States, and the buearucracy and the aristocracy, now it is money and the govt defenitly affect the cen. What can sell is well! Any govt will hold a major part in approving the context of whatever is being potrayed. In short only Govt accepted if not tacity approved narratives will see the light of day. The plit can be what is acceptable to the US govt with only its treatment left to the producers and Directors to ring the cash registers. Net series like Narcos spread across 20-30 episodes in 3 seasons definitely will keep user choice in mind. Swamped with options probably user still reigns superme with his/her choice to pay monthly subscriptions. The media has evoled from the scroll, lithograph, newspaper, television state run to privatised conlomerates to modern day netflix versions of history. Even technology unbiquitously enters r lives, outdating the earlier versions. Power, Money and Violence captures the imagination more quickly than routine sublimation of art and culture. He was supremly generous to the poor poeple of columbia Portrayal of event in History was based on perspectives of few that gained ground in the vast arena of the world. He enjoyed giving to others and thus was seen creating infrastructures like soccer fields etc. At the same time, Escobar was a supremly generous man for the poor people of columbia. He stole, killed and destroyed the mostly innocent lives of the people who became addicted to or died from cocain addiction, including those who tried to either terminate this buisness or conquer his position. He encouraged corruption at every level of the government. He ruled the medellin cartel with trememdous voilence. Pablo Escobar was such a figure, with the power and voilence and sucess, that he is a suitabel structure in the current times of how ambition can be over turned.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |